Federalist versus Antifederalists Essays -- American government, Polit

From the birth of our Re universal, Federalists and Antifederalist debated the nature of democracy and representation. One argument tough competing views of communities of interest and the nature of representation. Federalists desired a strong national judicature ruled by the political elite. Leaders should be isolated from the public and focus on making broad decisions at the national level. Antifederalists estimate promotion of local interests through likeminded congressional representation. Government should be as close to the people as possible and representatives actions should be based on their atoms wishes. Political compromises were reached as demonstrated in the makeup and subsequent composition of congress. The debate concerning the nature of democracy and representation continues today, beamed in the differing and competing goals of redistricting, in part cod to the vague nature and wording deep down the constitution. Both Federalist and Antifederalist vie ws atomic number 18 reflected in modern politics however American politics has consistently moved towards an Antifederalist ideology since the decline in condition of political parties.For the Antifederalists, communities of interest have a narrow definition, one which is two geographically and interest specific. Government should be close to the people with straight off democracy impractical, representation becomes necessary (FF 7, p.43). For representation to be accurate congressmen should reflect the local communities they represent a large number of representatives with small constituencies are necessary to insure individual interests are entertained. Small constituencies provide a more intimate relationship an increase in personal experience and communal... ...t government should be more accessible and is too far take from the public. Evidence shows that congressmen are concerned with staying connected to districts and invest considerable metre and energy being visi ble and available publically. Racial gerrymandering has provided unique descriptive representation opportunities but at the expense of historical geographic voter turnout communities. People hate congress but love their incumbent due to a committee system which generally rewards seniority and personalized constituent services. The high reelection rate has resulted in the institutional memory desired by Federalists while partisan gerrymandering has made political seats safer on some(prenominal) sides of the isle. Both sides are partially represented in 21st light speed politics but neither the Federalists nor Antifederalist would consider our current political modality ideal.