Vaginal Birth is better than Cesarian Section Research Paper

Vaginal Birth is better than cesarean Section - Research write up ExampleRelevant studies from the United Kingdom echoed findings that babies born from planned vaginal delivery had best outcomes compared to those who had Cesarian sections (Greer, et al. 2009, 675). Of the two approaches, vaginal delivery is cost-effective as it has the to the lowest degree risk for admission to the neonatal unit, least need for supplemental oxygen, least need for infirmary and physician services, and least incidence of hypoglycemia and respiratory problems. Guise et al. explained that Cesarian section is more expensive because of the following reasons (1) longer stays in the hospital of both mother and child and more intensive observation from physicians (2) longer delivery and operative period (3) increased risk for perioperative complications and (4) increased need for babys supplemental oxygen because of respiratory complications (39). As reflected in the studies given, vaginal birth offers th e most cost-effective approach of delivery because it does not involve an surgical operation/incision that may take days or weeks to heal. It is cost-effective for the mother because only the necessary medications, manipulation and services during delivery are being given. There is no need to avail of any surplus supplemental oxygen or treatment for the baby as babies born from vaginal birth lead fewer respiratory complications. While discomfort or pain during labor discouraged the mother to film vaginal birth, this was significantly outweighed by a number of risks that may harm the mother and child at a time they choose the Cesarian section.