Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Modern Executive Essay -- Machiavelli

The Prince and the Modern Executive Few question The Princes situate in the canon of western literature. That it marks a turning omen in our collective history, the origin of the study of politics as a science (pollack 43), is alone enough to warrant its classification as a Great Book. Its author, Niccolo Machiavelli, a contemporary of Copernicus, is gener bothy accepted as an earlyish contributor to the scientific revolution, because he looked at author and the nature of sovereignty through the eyes of a scientist, focused completely on the refinement without regard for religion and morals and ethics. Machiavelli taught that the way princes actually do ordinate often differs substantially from than the way they ought to govern, according to medieval Christian virtues. Sir Frederick Pollock wrote that in Machiavelli we find for the first time since Aristotle, the pure passionless infrequency of the man of science. We find the separation of Ethics and PoliticsMachiavelli tak es no grudge of morality (43). Machiavelli considers a successful ruler to be above morality, since the synthetic rubber and expansion of the state are the supreme objectives. There had not been such(prenominal) a frank rejection of morality since the Greek Sophists. His ideas are in s constantlye contrast with traditional church teachings. It is no wonder that The Prince was added to the Index of taboo books and even today remains one of the most criticized and controversial books ever written. It is a scientific investigation into the tactics of retaining power. It is about application of power in the pursuit a greater goal. The Prince is, above all, about leadership. though it is doubtful that Machiavelli realized the far reaching impact of his work. Its application is eternal and parti... ...l to read The Prince and, if they have already read it, read it again. As with all truly Great Books, each successive reading reveals fresh saucy ideas and insights. The Prince, thoug h disturbingly cold and frank at times, is no different. full treatment Cited Butterfield, Herbert. The Statecraft of Machiavelli. New York MacMillan, 1956. Jones, W. T. Masters of Political Thought. Ed. Edward, McChesner, and Sait. Vol. 2. Boston Houghton Mifflin, 1947. Lewis, Wyndham. The Lion and the have The Role of the Hero in the Plays of Shakespeare. London Methuen, 1951. Machiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince. Trans. Hill Thompson. Norwalk The Easton Press, 1980. Pollock, Frederick. An Introduction to the write up of the Science of Politics. London MacMillan, 1935. Ruffo-Fiore, Silvia. Niccolo Machiavelli. Boston Twayne Publishers, 1982.